← All decision toolsExplore AI adoption evidence

AI Adoption Explorer

Compare adoption indicators across countries and explore how evidence varies by business size and sector. Follow a question, inspect the sources and keep the findings worth discussing.

Start with a question

How common is AI use in this market? Which technologies are businesses using? What can another sector teach us?

Adoption is context, not a business case. The tool shows what the evidence covers—and where a comparison stops.

Loading official evidence…
Read the dates and definitions. European headline evidence is checked against Eurostat when you open the tool, with a dated snapshot as fallback. US and European detail, and UK, Canadian and Australian comparisons, use dated source snapshots. Coverage varies: these figures are context, not a precise benchmark for an individual business.
01 / THE INTERNATIONAL PICTURE

Start with a fair comparison

Compare European countries within the same survey framework. Explore other markets in their own evidence panels below.

Share of enterprises using AI0% — 100%

Missing or suppressed observations are shown as unavailable, never as zero. Click a country to inspect its evidence.

DIFFERENT SURVEYS / SEPARATE CONTEXT

Beyond Europe

These figures describe different populations and periods. They are not a global league table.

FOLLOW THE QUESTION

Explore beyond your closest peers

Your home market is a starting point. Evidence from another market or sector may suggest applications, barriers or questions worth investigating. Record what could transfer to your business and what needs testing.

US: applications and work

The BTOS AI supplement explores business functions, tasks and changes to work. Its survey period differs from the regular fortnightly adoption measure.

Explore official US tables ↗

UK: breadth and integration

ONS’s July 2026 analysis examines technologies, uptake and integration. Use it to frame questions alongside the dated UK adoption snapshot above.

Explore the ONS analysis ↗

Canada: intentions

The Q3 2026 tables cover planned AI use over the next 12 months. Explore intentions separately from the actual-use findings in the main comparison.

Explore planned-use tables ↗

Australia: SME context

Explore the official tracker for local SME perspectives. Check the survey’s employment bands, period and definitions before transferring a finding.

Explore the Australian tracker ↗

These links open the source publications. The US detailed tab imports core adoption and expectation tables; the specialist supplement and the other linked analyses remain external research routes.

YOUR RESEARCH NOTEBOOK

Keep the evidence worth returning to

Capture your current view with its sources and dates. Add the question you are exploring and your own interpretation. Saved entries stay on this browser; download a copy to keep or share.

METHOD & SOURCES

Evidence you can inspect

How these comparisons work

Country charts use Eurostat’s common framework and a single reference year. Industry and size breakdowns come from separate datasets: this edition does not infer joint country × industry × size estimates. In peer views, those dimensions are therefore shown separately.

Coverage is limited to published survey populations. Eurostat generally covers enterprises with at least 10 people employed in specified non-financial activities. Employment includes self-employed persons. Financial activities, agriculture and mining are outside its core population. Survey flags are retained. A shared framework improves comparability; it does not eliminate sampling uncertainty or national differences.

Eurostat expanded the listed technologies in 2025. Changes over time can partly reflect questionnaire changes. The Netherlands has a flagged break in series. Missing years are never interpolated. No pooled global adoption rate is calculated.

Data freshness and update status

UK, Canadian and Australian figures are verified snapshots, with their periods shown. US headline and peer results use the newly imported BTOS tables; the detailed US tab preserves survey periods and source wording. This tool is not a continuously updated international monitor. Use the dates on each result when interpreting the evidence.

Sources, reuse and interpretation

Explanatory notes follow fixed editorial rules and the published survey definitions. Profiles and saved research stay in this browser; no email address is collected. Download your notebook to keep an independent copy. Saved research preserves the evidence at the time of saving; reopening a live comparison may show newer data.